ES6 vs CommonJS
Syntax and Module Loading
CommonJS modules are synchronously loaded, meaning that the module files are loaded and parsed during the runtime as the code executes. This approach is well-suited for server-side environments where files are typically locally available and can be loaded quickly.
ES6 modules are designed to support asynchronous loading, allowing modules to be loaded over the network. This feature is advantageous in browser environments, enabling scripts to be loaded in parallel while the page loads.
In CommonJS, the server should load the module in order and then execute. Since files are stored locally on the server, the process won’t take long usually.
1 | // export module |
1 | // import module |
Imagine you are browsing a webpage with complex frontend, ES6 enables asynchronous loading, which means before some slow modules being loaded thorouly, you can see and interact with modules that are already loaded.
1 | import moduleA from 'moduleA'; |
1 | // app.js |
Design Philosophy
CommonJS was designed with server-side applications in mind, where modules are loaded and parsed as needed.
ES6 modules are designed to allow static analysis at compile time, supporting static optimizations and more complex import/export patterns, such as partial imports (tree shaking) and dynamic imports.
Interoperability
In modern JavaScript development, Node.js environments have started to support ES6 module syntax, but this typically requires specific configuration (such as using the .mjs file extension or setting “type”: “module” in “package.json”). This enables the use of ES6 module syntax in Node.js, while also supporting the import of CommonJS modules.
Nowadays, ES6 has been widely used on server side too. It depends on the circumstances to make choice between them.